![]() |
![]() |
|
Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
ir Brukne
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I am just interested when a male could be considered "popular sire" in our breed. When he has 5 litters? 10? 15? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 370
|
![]()
Yep, we didn't sorry. I'm a math geek at times.
![]() I also wonder when the "popular" will turn into "damaging to the gene pool".
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
ir Brukne
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
ir Brukne
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 370
|
![]()
I don't think the issue is overuse of a stud, though. The issues appear when all the tiny little recessive genes start to pop up. With a diverse gene pool these genes are still there but the chances are of having two lines with them get smaller and smaller. But when you line breed and have the same ancestor appear more than once it greatly increases these chances. The more they appear and the closer they are to the puppy will make it even that more likely.
So say one stud sires litters from 25% of the vlcaks out there. While this is a lot (understatement?) if then those puppies are carefully bred to qualifying dogs of the other 75% then you reduce the chances. "Over" use of a stud is not an issue if done carefully. I mentioned Lance of Fran Jo earlier. He is "blamed" (for the lack of a better term) for what the American line GSD has become. I feel bad for Lance. It wasn't his fault and I'm sure he wasn't bred to a huge percentage of the GSDs un the USA at the time. The issue arrived is when people started to line breed and breed puppies with close ancestors (I'm sure many have him as two grandparents). Then, these dogs got bred to other dogs with Lance in their lines and within a few generations you have hundreds to thousands of dogs who have him several times in their background. This is what needs to be avoided. So, I think even with one stud affecting 50% of a generation you still have another 50% to work with. While it would cut it close a few generations down, it's still manageable (just not easy). Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida & Minnesota U.S.
Posts: 252
|
![]()
Actually our breed does have a "popular sire" - Rep z PS. Show me a pedigree WITHOUT Rep in it...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Scandinavian Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
|
![]() Quote:
A genetic doctor ones did answer that question on another topic... For are breed he did say 45 offspring for a male dog, more offspring’s than that would probably do more damage than good, even if the stud was a very good and healthy dog. Best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________ *Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Moderator
|
![]()
So what's the difference between "popular sire" and "foundation sire"? Are all foundation sires by default popular sires, but not all popular sires are foundation sires?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|