|
|
|
|||||||
| Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
senior member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
I assume that the actual litter sizes were much larger than officially documented. Especially in those days it was common practice to select rigorously; keeping the best puppy(s) and "simply" euthanise the rest.For example those who proved to be too shy. I'm not sure about it, but I do think it is likely that's the reason why we only see one or two F1 pups with some of the wolf crossings. Also just because a wolf crossing usually results in large litters (fresh blood). I seem to recall having read about it here on the forum or perhaps in the book by Karl Hartl. Possibly some forum users from the countries of origin can tell more about it? Last edited by buidelwolf; 12-11-2010 at 02:16. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
|
Hmmm.. I wonder if this is the case. It would make sense, certainly. If anyone has read Hartl's book, does it elaborate on this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Canadian Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
In the Book they don't really talk about it... We only know that some dogs had better capacity to be train and were more predisposed for the project of a new breed... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bad Dürkheim
Posts: 2,249
|
The military did the first character-test with 8 weeks and every pup not fulfilling them was put down. This continued till adult age.
Also that Major Rosik writes that they rescued some few dogs after the military decided not to use them any longer means exacly this, they were rescued. Ina |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
senior member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 163
|
Thanks Ina, I knew you should know. It confirms almost certainly the theory I had. Do you also have information about the other questions?
Last edited by buidelwolf; 12-11-2010 at 02:24. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bad Dürkheim
Posts: 2,249
|
No not really, to be honest I never bothered. But having raised wolves and having talked about this during the Mutara times and before with Erik Zimen who did the same bilogical experiment with poodles and dogs, I think they took these wolves because they simply have been available for them .It is not that easy to mate a wolf and a dog that have not been raised together as it is with two dogs. So I think, like with the Mutara´s parents, they just happend to be there in this combinations.
Ina |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Canadian Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 423
|
Thank you Ina
But... Did its mean all the first hybrides (F1) from Brita who had no Owner (like this one http://www.wolfdog.org/dbase/d/1287) as been finally put down??? It's really an interesting thread Regards, |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
|
In army was very strict selection, as Ina wrote here. Only a few best hybrids with best working character was used for next breeding. Other dogs............
It can be problem for people, which will want now create new bloodline. In past was used from 1 litter maybe 2 pups. But now if we will have litter of hybrids, every owner will want use his own hybrid for next breeding. Bad dogs too. It is nothing good for breed. For breed is bad situation now, when are in breeding used almost all wolfdogs with 4 legs. Nobody select for character. It is very bad especially for our breed with wolf´s blood. cs. wolfdog was created as working breed. And now- look at population..... So I think some new experiments without selection is nonsens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
I fully agree with Hanka, though neither am I involved in breeding, nor intend to be.
Having read about training methods and selection procedures in PS Kennel I cannot imagine it feasible to reconstruct "military approach" at present and in civilian conditions. Who today: 1. would provide funding of a few hrs daily standardized training for pups and dogs in one place for several years? (including fees for scientists, costs of health testing, wages for trainers and for dog handlers/leaders from the same area willing to work with dogs most of their time?) 2. would take decisions to eutanize pups/hybrids that would not pass exteremely tough working/tracking tests and... carry out these decisions 3. would agree to have his/her beautiful and loveable dog (hybrid?) eutanized (or even just sterelized), only because he/she would not have passed the working/tracking/trailing tests? etc. etc. 4. If having a very detailed breed standard available, the csv community among themselves cannot agree about simple bonitation standards , and the judges conduct them not always fairly (5. And last but not least: adding fresh wolf blood into the CSV breed would mean that in some countries csv would be authomatically banned and in some others would have less chance to be legalized. Last edited by Rona; 12-11-2010 at 13:40. Reason: spel. er. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
http://www.srdcervac.wbs.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Unhošť - Nouzov
Posts: 1,313
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Another fact is that the primary reason for crossbreeding wolf and GSD at the beginning was the improvement of health and endurance of working dogs, especially GSD, creating the new breed came second... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|