Misleading article about Hybrids and Wolfdogs

michaelundinaeichhorn · 17-11-2009, 15:11

Hi,

why is this article misleading?
The last sentence of Dogs Today's editor, Ms Beverley Cudd is absolutely correct and speaks for itself.

"Wolves are wonderful and much maligned in children's fiction, but they are hugely different from dogs and should be kept separate.
Hybrids are a potential disaster area."

Or do you mean misleading in the sense of confusing the two recognized breeds with high content hybrids?
Then you're right, more dangerous than hybrids, at least to our breed are people like this Richardson guy.
Alone his following sentence "The big bad wolf is misleading." in connection with his statement demonstrates that he hasn't got a clue what he's drivelling on about.

Michael

17-11-2009, 15:11	#2
michaelundinaeichhorn Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Bad Dürkheim Posts: 2,249	Hi, why is this article misleading? The last sentence of Dogs Today's editor, Ms Beverley Cudd is absolutely correct and speaks for itself. "Wolves are wonderful and much maligned in children's fiction, but they are hugely different from dogs and should be kept separate. Hybrids are a potential disaster area." Or do you mean misleading in the sense of confusing the two recognized breeds with high content hybrids? Then you're right, more dangerous than hybrids, at least to our breed are people like this Richardson guy. Alone his following sentence "The big bad wolf is misleading." in connection with his statement demonstrates that he hasn't got a clue what he's drivelling on about. Michael Last edited by michaelundinaeichhorn; 17-11-2009 at 15:19.