|
|
|
|||||||
| _Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters.... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
You right - it is why it will be written by every result if it is official (and who made it) or unofficial (basing on the results of the parents or the offsprings).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
Don't you think that breeder wil point to the database...see my dog is free... so I don't have to show you a result and I don't have to test
And I think that people wil read the unofficial result like it is official and make their discision based on this 'test' that was not done..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Howling Member
|
What about the puppies of "unofficial" dogs? Example: Grandparents all negative by test, parents clear because of this...at least for our testing clinic (OFFA), this 3rd generation must be tested to be considered clear (in case there is some new mutation, I guess)
__________________
"What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."~Henry David Thoreau http://www.galomyoak.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
No - it is only for one generation. One forward and one back.
Alrready now we were able to find out several DM-carriers what is important for the owners because the dogs do not live anymore and can not be tested - buy owners of their puppies know not there there is a possibility that their dogs can be also carriers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Non active.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Outside, walking the dog.
Posts: 2,873
|
Maybe you also can give HD/ED results based on the test off the parents
???Just no result without a official test result .Otherwise we are back to the Fairytales again
__________________
Just treat stupid situations like a dog.....If you can't play with it or eat it....... Then just piss on it and walk away .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Gran figl de putt Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,638
|
This choice is wrong from scientific point view, and agaist international accreditation rule's.
Between Mendel laws and and the exact match of a gene transmitted, thera are human hand, and potential error, or mistake. Is for this than International Accreditation Law ask for every animal (not only dog), ufficial test result. Only with this rules genetic selection can be free from mistake,fraud. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
What is also important - and especially now - is to keep in consideration that you can infer the genetics of a pup from the official results of it's ancestors only if you are sure about the parentage. Because otherwise all Czechoslovak wolfdogs are still BB in theory. And of course, it does not rule out mutations.
__________________
Saschia (Sasa Zahradnikova) http://www.chiens-loup-tchecoslovaqu...ei-et-damon.ws |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 472
|
I don't think that this decision is wise.
From scientific point of view - it's deadly wrong, because genetic rules are figured out by human are not nature's rules, neccessarily. There still is a chance that genes undergo mutation - in either way. Furthermore, it will include - and exclude - potential breeding "material" only just because of assumption. And it will not force people to pay for an official test, on the contrary, why take (and pay for) a test if my dog is already marked as N/? - when it's enough to breed with... You have put so many hours and work into this data base - with this decision it will become less valueable, less reliable. That would be a great loss for our breed. Please, at least re-think this decision, I know this is a private page and data base but you have many users who - like you - are interested in the future of the Czech.Wolfdogs.
__________________
Kein Mensch darf mir meine Schwächen so deutlich zeigen, wie meine (Wolfs-)Hunde es tun. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
It is made by the most known laboratory. Believe me - they would not make it of they will have ANY doubts that it is ok. Quote:
Another possible explanation of such cases is that the parentage is not OK. If the owners have "unofficial" information which will be different than the results they will receive it can force them to make more investigation - to test the parentage or to repeat the DM-test. If will help to clear such cases. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
If we can not be sure that even the OFFICIAL results are 100% clear of "human hand" why we should post ANY results? Remember that the same apply to HD results - they are ALWAYS subjective. Sure they meassure the angles but still there is sometimes even 20% differences between vets in one country. You will NEVER be sure if a person will not make a "mistake". There will be always a small percetage of possible errors. But even OFFA makes the same as we do - if the parents are tested by OFFA the puppies are treated the same way like we do. If there is a parentage test the puppies will even receive OFFICIAL certificartes WITHOUT testing. And they really know that they are doing... About mutations: they exist but the possibility that they appear is so small that they are pased over. Only here of forum people try to explain every abnormality with "mutattion". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Gran figl de putt Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,638
|
Quote:
You can ask here: is official italian istitution for laboratory rules on Breeding, human healt, food and more...and they take international rules... we have those information from this institut.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warnsveld
Posts: 2,033
|
Quote:
Quote:
I am not happy at all with publishing unofficial test results for several reasons that others did already mention. And I also am not happy with labs that accept swabs of owners (without checking chip by an independent vet) for DNA tests…. (Owners can make mistakes and breeders have more chances to cheat) And based on this a lot more mistakes can be made (wrong conclusions) with publishing unofficial results
__________________
Vriendelijke groeten, Mijke PS: I am not a moderator anymore!!
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Howling Member
|
http://offa.org/dna_cbp.html
Above is the link to OFFA's policy on "Clear by Parentage" - maybe it would be useful to put a similar mark "CPB" by dogs who are clear by "official" results from parents - "unofficial" seems to imply results are only those reported by owners (with no official papers/links to back it up) - I think ALL posted health results should stem originally from verified results. * One other thing that is interesting to note is that all dogs (mother/father/puppy) must be DNA identity profiled to have clear by parentage, to prove they are actually related - so we don't accidentally register mixes...
__________________
"What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."~Henry David Thoreau http://www.galomyoak.com
Last edited by GalomyOak; 05-10-2011 at 12:07. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Non active.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Outside, walking the dog.
Posts: 2,873
|
Quote:
,.....................But it makes me happy you also know .
__________________
Just treat stupid situations like a dog.....If you can't play with it or eat it....... Then just piss on it and walk away .
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|