|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 132
|
Ok, I wrote it before, but will quote it again. This is one of requirements for KC recognition:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 27
|
with that in mind though the KC had as good as registered the CsV as a breed before defra stuck their boot in. so there must still be at least 20 dogs with pedigree's in the UK, unless people have exported?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
rookie
|
Quote:
U can see my dogs on here,only he and his mother are 'not registered' we are not asking for the kc to recognise fci, we are asking them to recognise the csv... no? If it was granted once and taken away because of defra...the kc must of had what they required to grant it in the first place. Last edited by tupacs2legs; 25-09-2011 at 01:51. Reason: added bit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||||
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 132
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If any one has some ideas, or thoughts about it, please share it. It may help... |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
rookie
|
YEs hedeon I guess we will see....I feel its a slight vendetta against my dog....4 litters in all these years is not 'litters appearing out of nowhere'
Its funny how its a problem because they are british dogs,so many things equal 'farce' abroad about these dogs but if its britain included its guilty until proven innocent....that and mere snobbery!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 132
|
??? Layla, this is no vendetta, I promise. Just wrote how I think things can be seen from KC perspective. But what I know? I would like to have discussion here, I now I am probably wrong. Just want someone to tell "no, you are wrong, we can do it 'that' way, or another way". This no way mean I against something, or some one. Really.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|