CSV statistic

[Nebulosa]

Thank's very much, Elf !

[elf]

Originally Posted by Nebulosa

Thank's very much, Elf !

I added for "Find dogs born in year:" the mean COI (on 5 and 8 generations) for the chosen year. This gives since 1990:

Mean COI on 8 generations:



Mean COI on 5 generations:



So if the former rule was to try to be less than 10% on 5 generations, let's roll the new rule, less than 5% on 5 generations.

[saschia]

Nice work Elf.

Would it be possible to have sorting option (or filtering), for for example the country of origin, HD, ED, bonitation code etc?

[elf]

Hello Saschia, I added a filter by country for:

"Find dogs born in year:"
"Find dogs with HD:"
"Find dogs with ED:"
"Find dogs with PRA:"
"Enter expression to find in bonitation:"
"Enter expression to find in training:"

If one want no filter by country just select "All countries".

[saschia]

So fast ;o) thanks!

[elf]

Originally Posted by saschia

So fast ;o) thanks!

Yeah I was in the process of adding it .

Added also average AVK (in "Find dogs born in year:" and "Find breeder"). This gives since 1990:

Average AVK on 8 generations:



Average AVK on 5 generations:

[Mikael]

Originally Posted by elf

let's roll the new rule, less than 5% on 5 generations.

YES !!!

And one thing more, even if I do not wont you to work your self to death is it possible to add whitch dogs are not alive ???

And I just wont to add again, Excellent work Dr Anthony The breed loves you Auuuuuuuu- After all we wont happy wolf not crying wolf

Best regards / Mikael

[saschia]

Originally Posted by Mikael

After all we wont happy wolf not crying wolf

I think Edit might object slightly

[elf]

is it possible to add whitch dogs are not alive ???

I don't have this information, I guess it will be in the next database, maybe Admin would be able tell us.

[saschia]

I think this might be a problem, as not all deaths are accounted for and then you wouldn't know which dog is alive and which is just not reported. Unless you took the age of say 18 years as suspected dead unless proven alive.

[Nebulosa]

Originally Posted by elf

I don't have this information, I guess it will be in the next database, maybe Admin would be able tell us.

Uhm.. all death dogs are marked with a red X at the side of their name.
But I wonder if will be possible to pass this information also for the statistics in the easy way.

[buidelwolf]

Hello Antony,

Really a fantastic tool as I already wrote. I've already made several interseting studies with it.

I added for "Find dogs born in year:" the mean COI (on 5 and 8 generations) for the chosen year. This gives since 1990:

Many dogs, born in the last years, seem to have increasingly low COI, measured on five (or eight) generations. This seems to be a positive development, but .... those appearances are a little bit deceiving, as the real coi reveals in fact on all generations, not only on 5 or even 8 generations.

What worries me a little bit is that I discovered that almost all dogs, even in the last years, have a COI, measured on ALL generations, of about 20% or higher. You rarely see one with a COI less than 17% measured on ALL generations. I wonder if it could be possible to measure the COI of all dogs born in year X measured on all generations? It might be very interesting to discover whether the COI measured on ALL generations in recent years is reduced and to what extent.

Anthony, thanks again. Great job!

Great tool! Well done!

Can you add a search, who find out where the most dogs in a country come original from?
For example in France: are the most in foreign countrys bought dogs from Czech Republik or Slovakia or maybe Italy?
That will be very interesting.

[saschia]

Originally Posted by buidelwolf

Many dogs, born in the last years, seem to have increasingly low COI, measured on five (or eight) generations. This seems to be a positive development, but .... those appearances are a little bit deceiving, as the real coi reveals in fact on all generations, not only on 5 or even 8 generations.

Yes, this is a problem in some way. We are working with a closed group of animals, which therefore are all related to each other to some degree. On the other hand, that's (if you take all generations) true for all breeds and actually all species as well. So one thing is, how far in the number of generations, is it sensible to go.

On the other hand, although the animals from for example one litter are very related, they nevertheless have different genes, different expression levels of the same genes etc. Plus there are always changes in the genome in the form of mutations, deletions, duplications etc. So after some number of generations these changes may have larger effect than the relatedness of the animals. So that's another reason why taking into account all generations is not sensible.

So, in breeding it is good to take into account the COI and AVK coefficients, but not use them as the only leading tool - because you can get them closer to ideal values by just breeding a lot with young animals therefore increasing the number of generation in certain time interval, while it is important to select which animals to use according to their health, character and exterior.