|
|
|
|||||||
| _Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters.... |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#30 | |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
|
Quote:
But in this moment we have to consider that dogs without ED results are included, whereas dogs with not positive ED results are excluded. I believe that the FIRST STEP to be taken is to include all dogs with or without ED results, and not to discriminate dogs with "not perfect" ED results, as explained in the petition. (this is MY personal point of view, not the point of view of all the petitioners) Only afterwards, we can think about new rules to be applied. The point is that the actual situation is clearly unfair and discriminatory, and needs to be changed immediately. Agreeing on the "new rules" to be applied is much more complicated, and requires reasonings to be shared...this is my thought but I am more than willing to consider different proposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|