Mixes: Passo del lupo (Italy)

[loco]

So, that is what I say...............

Originally Posted by loco

I thought the rule is still true, that one is not guilty until proven guilty.
But, correct me if I'm wrong.

[Rona]

Originally Posted by loco

So, that is what I say...............

Oh, OK. I got it now!

[loco]

Works for both sides .

[Martab]

Rona, please admit that is is a bit arrogant and despothic to do this… for me it's clear he wanted to say only this

"Where is it written dogs are suspicious of anything? " ?!??!!

Database say that they are "not any more suitable for breeding"…even though they have all tests needed and much much more than a lot of "suitable for breeding" dogs without bonitance etc etc etc... more "suspicious" of that!

[Rona]

Originally Posted by Martab

Rona, please admit that is is a bit arrogant and despothic to do this…

I told you I didn't understand why somebody could get so excited about some silly signs. There are dogs dying of ill-treatment, pseudo breeders/ businessmen/ puppy millers destroying the work of generations of honest people and breed lovers and people stay indifferent, don't care, but a little -!- , the meaning of which has never been clearly explained, makes them levitate! Sorry, but to me this is absurd!

Originally Posted by Martab

for me it's clear he wanted to say only this

I don't know what he wanted to say, but I know what he said. Even if we have different views and discuss them strongly here - there is no need to use such language and such metaphors! There are limits to insensivity!

[Navarre]

I think we all are waiting for an answer from Admin.
The point is'nt only the symbol but the fact that some dog aren't anymore "approved for breeding".

In the case of Glock Arian...you may dislike the dog, you may dislike the owner, you may dislike the breeder (I too) but he is for sure a real CSW, being from well known blood lines, he made exibitions, bonitace, hd, dna, working tests etc.

With him there are many other owners with the same problem ... not saying that wolfdog.org should be "democratic" (might be too difficult for people of Eastern Europe), but RULES are necessary and these rules should be well known by users and must be valid for everyone, to maintain credibility.