Norwegian proposing ban on CsV
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			Hi to you all. 
 
My dear friend Tonje has translated the Norwegian poposal. On of the  
paragraphs is somewhat difficult to understand for simple people like Tonje   
and me. An alternate text is place in paranthesis ( - ). 
I should like you to study the text. The proposal will be discussed by the   
Committee of Justice, Norwegian Parlament. At a later time (tomorrow  ?)  
I'll send you a list of the members of the Committee of Justice as well as   
to the members of Parliament. 
 
I should like to have your oppinion of a uniform reaction to the proposal. 
Text follows: 
 
 
---------- 
15.5.4 Should crosses between dog and wolf be considered dangerous dogs? 
 
Several instances asked to give recommendations concerning a new dog law,  
are in favor of a ban on breeding dog=96wolf crosses and also a prohibition   
against keeping or importing such mixed breeds. 
 
Dangerous behavior towards human beings from wolves in their natural  
environment is practically nonexistent.  As is apparent from section 15.4,   
a large number of groups agree that crosses between dog and wolf are  
dangerous for people.  Internationally, there is an increasing interest in   
certain communities in wolf-dog crosses with a high wolf content. 
 
The Department chooses this as a basis and therefore suggests as a starting   
point that such animals be defined as dangerous dogs. 
 
There is less agreement on how high such a wolf content should be, for the   
animal to be classified as dangerous and therefore banned.  The Norwegian  
Kennel Club maintain that all dog breeds have roots in animals considered  
wolves, and that also many of the dog breeds of today have some association   
or other to wolves in the breed=92s early days. 
 
The Department will maintain that the question to be discussed, is how much   
inbreeding of wild wolf in dog in recent time should be encompassed by a  
ban.  In the evaluation of a ban, there should, amongst others, be sought a   
definition that is as practical as possible. 
 
Several dog breeds may have wolf in the breeding process prior to the dog  
being acknowledged a breed by FCI of which the Norwegian Kennel Club is a  
member.  In recent time this is the case for the Saarlos Wolfdog and the  
CSV.  It can not be excluded that the same is the case for eg. The German  
Shepherd Dog, Alaskan Malamute, Siberian Husky  and the Belgian Sheepdog  
breeds.  But especially the German Shepherd Dog is an extensively tested  
and wellknown dog breed which, even though with a possible early wolf  
element, has a normal function in society and is also utilized as a working   
dog to a great extent. 
 
The Department has been in doubt to how extensive a ban on dog types that  
are a cross between wolf and dog, should be.  The Department has as a  
starting-point, that it has no grounds to suggest banning of dog types that   
are well established in this country.  It could be appropriate to restrict   
this to dog breeds with original wolf mixing, which are registered in  
Norway by the Norwegian Kennel Club before January 1st 2003. 
 
(Alternative translation:  It could be appropriate to accept all dog breeds   
acknowledged by the Norwegian Kennel Club before January 1st 2003,  
regardless of original wolf content) 
 
But if there has been an inbreeding of pure wolf in individuals of the  
breed after the breed has been acknowledged by the FCI which the  
registrations in the Norwegian Kennel Club are based on, the ban should  
encompass offspring from such individuals.  With such a restriction, the  
Department assumes that the ban can protect against new dog types that are   
a mix between wolf and dog, that the prohibition can practically be  
enforced, and that established and widespread dog types are not affected by   
the ban. 
 
The abovementioned restriction, means that the dog breeds CSV and Saarloos   
Wolfdog are not affected by the ban.  However, the Department finds it  
necessary to evaluate in particular a ban against these breeds.  The  
Department bases this on that both are breeds with large requirements to  
their owners.  Precise information on amount of wolf content, has not come   
forth.  For Saarloos Wolfdog the last inbreeding of wolf was approx. 40  
years ago.  CSV has a shorter history, and the first successful inbreeding   
with wolf in the breeding program was in 1958.  These dogs are few in  
Norway today.  The Department is not aware that they have caused any damage   
or harm. 
 
The Swedish Kennel Club decided in 1997 that Saarloss Wolfdog and CSV  
should not be allowed to be registered or participate in any Kennel Club  
based activity.  In a press notice the 29th of April 1997 the Board of the   
Swedish Kennel Club said amongst others: 
<<One of the breeds in question comes from former Czechoslavakia, is called   
ceskoslovensky vlcak and is considered very shy and watchful. It was given   
an interrim approval by the FCI in 1992. The other breed is from the  
Netherlands, is called saarloos woolfhond, and has a very reserved and  
independent manner. This breed has a final FCI approval. Both breeds are  
very similar to the wolf, also exteriorwise. The Swedish kennel Club has  
previously taken a definite stand against non-registered wolf hybrids.  
Amongst others in "remissvar"(written and posted answers?) and in a policy   
decision not to allow wolf breeds to participate in any activities within  
the organisation. The same applies to the socalled pitbull terrier. One of   
the reasons for the strong dissociation from these breedmixes, is a  
considerably increased risk of harm to people and other animals.>> 
 
The Department has come to the conclusion that Saarloos Wolfdog should  
follow the general rule for the time being, while the CSV should be  
considered a dangerous dog according to the new law.  It can not be  
excluded that it could become relevant to forbid the Saarloos Wolfdog also,   
especially if it appears in communities that can not be assumed to have a  
responsible attitude to such dogs. 
 
Regards 
 
--- 
Per Olav
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 |