Hello,
this looks like a discussion without any end.
Why could not be a breeder from the West an even good breeder as from the East?
When he is good enough, then he also cares about the puppy's, he even play with them, he even socialisate them and do all the things what he have to do for normal, balanced dogs.
It is his responsibility to take care of the puppy's because HE wants them and put them on this world. When HE only do this for making money then he is in my opinion not a good breeder, because from breeding you cannot make a living from it, only you have every 14 days a litter during the whole year. And that is inpossible with CW's. when this kind of breeders has a lot of other races, he cannot pay attention to CW's and even the other puppy's from other races. In that case, I wouldn't buy a puppy from such a breeder. Even 2 litters is very intensive to raise them.
So the difference of good breeders is also not a question of origin countries but also the status of good breeder. And what is a good breeder???? Everybody has so his own opinion about this.
A puppybuyer and the breeder have to be confidence in each other. If confidence is not there, then you can better not buy a puppy or sell a puppy to eachother.
By the way, mostly every breeder in the West, had bought his dogs, which he breed with in the East, and when he is on a good way, he tried to breed to the standard of the East, so the same question again, where is the difference?????
Letty
|