Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherdor
Je suis en parfait accord avec ArImInIuM auquel je pourrais ajouter que les nouveaux "tags", comme "Approuvé pour la reproduction" relève de caractère "diffamant".
Je rappelle que la seule règle est dictée par la FCI.
Je ne comprends pourquoi certains chiens se retrouvent "Non approuvé", et la chienne née chez moi est un parfait exemple
http://www.wolfdog.org/site/fr/dbase/d/10464
Cette chienne dispose des mêmes informations (comme HD par exemple) que d'autres femelles |
The rules for "aprooved for breding" are extremly easy: the dog must be
pure Czechoslovakian Wolfdog (1) which has
breeding rights (2) in its country and
x-rays (3).
http://www.wolfdog.org/forum/showthread.php?t=21161
The dog you mentioned has no x-rays visible in the database. It means the copy was not sent.
So one more time: we do not accept words of ANYONE. I'm sorry but it is not enough to write us the x-rays results but we need also the
scaned copy. WHY? Because there are to many liars among the owners and breeders - believe me you would be surprised if I would write the names of the breeders who was trying to cheat the results (they wrote that a dog is HD-free but people who buyed the puppies wrote us that they get the pedigrees where was written that the parents are dysplatic or not checked).